You found a Lookie! (euw)               Here's what this lookie contains...


The following is a Twitter conversation assembled by @mkennedy.

[update: It looks like the original article might have moved - the link in the first tweet doesn't seem to take you to the ORM article. I could be confused...]

There was quite a conversation today on Twitter about a blog post by Rob Conery! Here's the original post and the ensuing Twitter fun. See what you think about it and join in the conversation.

Happy Holdays to all! In case you're wondering - I have only one wish for Christmas: that ORM's would go away: http://bit.ly/80VfJi
252 days ago by @robconery

@robconery Wishing it won't make it so. Data Access is never trivial regardless of whether you use an OR/M or not.
252 days ago by @RickStrahl

@RickStrahl Of course it is - WE make it not trivial.
252 days ago by @robconery

@robconery Your example of rails is not really realistic given that rails fails on anything that doesn't fit table == object metaphor.
252 days ago by @RickStrahl

@RickStrahl Not realistic? It's sitting right in front of me! Meh whatever - this conversation is what my post is all about.
252 days ago by @robconery

@robconery Yeah well, if you throw shit out without being a little more specific WTF do you expect?
252 days ago by @RickStrahl

@RickStrahl "throw shit out" - did I touch a nerve with you or something? I thought I offered my thoughts pretty clearly.
252 days ago by @robconery

@robconery Not really - you offered a concept without anything to attach the concept to. IOW, you left me hanging...
252 days ago by @RickStrahl

@RickStrahl Fair enough - post removed. If our conversation is an indicator of comments to come - I'd like to avoid it
252 days ago by @robconery

@robconery Dude you maybe taking this a little too hard. Nothing wrong with new ideas. But you're obvisly thinking about something specific
252 days ago by @RickStrahl

@RickStrahl Yah - you're right. It's super frustrating. Maybe that bled into the post, I thought the ideas were pretty clear.
252 days ago by @robconery

@robconery @robconery i would loathe to do the DTO/Assembler pattern again in a static language with all the built-in support in ruby
252 days ago by @bellware

  Tweet this     Digg this   Submit this to Stumbleupon   email this lookie
77 views - last modified Saturday, December 26, 2009